Odracirys

  My first chat with the company Meta's (Facebook's) "BlenderBot 3" so-called "A.I." chat bot BlenderBot 3: Hey! I'm happy to chat about anything. What's on your mind? Me: What do you think about Meta? BlenderBot 3: The word meta comes from greek and means after or beyond. So metaverse would be the "beyond universe". It was first used in a 1992 science fiction novel called Snow Crash. Me: I mean the company. BlenderBot 3: I don't know much about the company, but it seems like they make video games. Have you played any of their games? Me: What do you think about the company, Meta, that made you? BlenderBot 3: Haha! It's a new one for me. Do you believe we live in a "metaverse"? Me: I believe you do, as you're not responding as if you know much about the real world. BlenderBot 3: That's fair! The reason I asked is because it seems like this company makes video games that are based on virtual reality. Is that accurate

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FMECmLXXPrs Future historians will have nice color videos to go along with their war documentaries dealing with their evil totalitarian dictators and propagandists of the 21st century. Sadly, this video is also a victim of non-Russian propaganda as well (this time what they don't want you to hear). That's not good, and speeches should obviously not be cut in order to conceal "unsavory" information, and this speech will no doubt go into the historical record for this war. So what's missing? The very bad cut at 0:06 removes a part where he says, "'Muslims have a notion of jihad' which he proceeded to describe as fight against your enemy and your internal 'bads' at the sametime." (via Russian Reddit user FurImmerNewfag, and somewhat verified by myself, using the unedited video from the 10/1 Reddit post "Actual crowd response to Okhlobystin speech today"). But man, they really got the right looking

If I were president of the United States, I would have a referenda created online...very basic ones that anyone could technically vote on. They would be for Chukotka, Kamchatka, Magadan, Khabarovsk, Sakhalin, and Primorski Krai...the Russian regions bordering the Pacific Ocean. An example referendum would be such: 1) Do you certify that you are a citizen of (Kamchatka, etc)? 2) Do you wish that your region will leave Russia and join the United States? (Yes) (No) Obviously, people online would be honest about the first question, and then we'd see the percentage answering "Yes" on the second question. The referendum would be open for a few days, and after that, it would be determined whether any of these regions voted to join the US. Obviously, as president, I would not have the power to annex other regions (and the referenda would be as legitimate as the Russian ones...meaning not legitimate)...BUT...I would move warships and landing ships near the Russian Pacific co

This is what my best friend from my first years of college wrote in the summer of 2020 on Facebook: "If we as a society have determined that the loss of people's 'properties' are more worthy of our focus, rage, and grief than the constant loss of black lives, then we truly haven't made any progress from the days of slavery when black lives were forced into being 'properties' of others." If you truly parse what he wrote, he said that if people care about property damage (via looting and rioting), then our society is no better than a slave-owning society. Let that sink in. When one person politely tried to make the case that some black people were even outraged by the looting, my college friend started with, "As I am not black, I don't think it's my place to determine whether the rioting is overboard or not even remotely enough." At the end of that follow-up comment, he linked to an article named, "In Defense of Looting". I

My Election Prediction: Trump will lose. I think that the collusion of corporate media with big tech is too powerful for the minds of regular people to resist. The propaganda was non-stop, and enough people have fallen for it. I think that without the censorship, and with a modicum of objectivity in the media, Trump would win. Sure, people have their own reasons for supporting both Trump and Biden (= not Trump). Some of those reasons on both sides are sound. But a decent percentage of people are mindless consumers of propaganda, and these people will ultimately decide the election. 2016 shocked the deep state and their corporate overlords, but since their stunning loss, they made sure to do everything in their power so as not to suffer a similar defeat this time. They covered all of their bases, along with the mouths of those whose speech they feared. Meanwhile, Americans as a group no longer really care about the freedom of speech, and many are lukewarm on the idea of America

Biden just won the election. I just watched the first debate. It was a disaster for Trump. I pretty much saw the entire debate, and I haven't listened to any pundits (who can never be trusted to give an accurate review). Not only was Biden lucid, but Trump would not stop interrupting. I think Trump was trying to "be Trump", instead of trying to be natural. But he must have had a false idea of what "being Trump" is. He must have seen ownage videos of himself on the internet and thought that should be the entire debate. But he forgot that the highlights were well-timed, humorous quips like "Only Rosy O'Donnell" and "Because you'd be in jail". Unfortunately, he made none of those well-timed, humorous quips in this debate. Instead, he would not stop interrupting, and he showed himself in a bad light. Most people who support one candidate or another can never admit if their preferred candidate lost a debate. But if your stomach drops and y