Skip to main content
How Mitt Romney and Joe Biden Won Their Debates
(or How We Are Making Society Worse)


I do listen to what others say, but I always apply thought to it and never just follow the herd.  This is what happened during the recent American presidential and vice presidential debates.  And I came to the exact opposite conclusions as were generally announced in the media.

Now, the way I determine if someone won a debate is whether I feel they did a good job getting across their message in a good way.  I may not agree with someone's message at all, but if I think that person got it across better, I'll give that person the win.  Such was the case when I saw Thunderf00t (a YouTube atheist) debating certain creationists.  In most instances, I felt that the creationists won...not because they were right, but because Thunderf00t's showing made me feel embarrassed for him.  He just has trouble debating.

Now, I watched the debates before I heard any of the talking heads on TV, and this is what I thought:

Barack Obama won the first debate against Mitt Romney.  Although he didn't answer some of the blatant lies levied against him, he appeared presidential and answered the questions in an easily understandable and professional way.  Mitt Romney, on the other hand, was aggressive and childish, both towards his opponent and towards the moderator.  I am not saying that a debater must not be aggressive - Christopher Hitchens is the perfect example of someone who could be aggressive in style.  The way Romney was aggressive, though, just made him seem pathetic.

Paul Ryan beat Joe Biden.  After the media said that Mitt Romney won, I was sort of shocked.  Mitt was so rude and appeared to be the bully.  It was then that I realized that viewers like bullying more than they like substance.  This is also the reason why there are far more "reality" shows on TV than there are science shows...the mob finds aggression more entertaining than facts.  Also, perhaps Fox News or some other conservative source was merely the first to announce a victory, and everyone followed them (as in the 2000 elections with them declaring Bush the winner).  People don't like thinking for themselves.  They love to be told what to think.  This goes for news networks, too.  After that, I realized that the Democrats would force Joe Biden to be extremely aggressive - cutting off his opponent during his opponent's time to speak, snickering, and asking the moderator, "You're gonna let me answer, right?" even when it was apparent that his time to answer was coming up.  I knew that the Democrats would give into the mob which feeds off anger and try to turn the next debate into a fight.  And I also knew that it would be Biden to do it, as he is already known for being more outspoken than Obama.

I should have posted my prediction, because I was proven right but only to myself.  It would have been nice for others to realize that I was right, too!  Biden did exactly what I thought he'd do.  He was rude and childish as Romney had been in the first debate.  And most people ate it up.  And this is how we are the ones who are degrading civility and society in general.  We don't laud those who are better, but rather those who are louder.

Now, there's one other thing I should point out.  CNN's poll showed that Ryan had won the debate.  Yet CNN admitted that it polled mostly Republicans.  I ask, how could you possibly respect a news organization which asks a mostly Republican group who won, and they then pick their man, and then this news organization posts this as being a legitimate poll.  This should be a scandal, yet it isn't.  Their poll is being picked up by other "news" organizations and being spread around willy-nilly, with people who just read headlines none the wiser.  I do think that Ryan won, but CNN should be ashamed of themselves for deceiving people.

Well, those are my thoughts about the debates.  I really hope that the next presidential debates have both people calm and answering questions in a civil way, without ingratiating themselves to those who have been cheapening society through their preference for drama over substance.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Fighting Klanophobia I'm always hurt when I see bigots offend groups of people.  All too often, people paint a group, "the other" with a broad brush and stereotype them as being evil, even though the crimes that are associated with them are only committed by a tiny minority fringe element within the larger group. Such is the case with the Ku Klux Klan.  Most people don't like to associate with them.  There is a lot of prejudice directed towards that group, particularly among blacks and Jews, but this hate is widespread.  If you see a klansman wearing his cultural garb, how do you feel?  Do you become nervous?  Do you think that he'll do something violent?  If so, you're part of the problem. The KKK is an organization of peace.  Most of its members are peaceful and only want to go about their lives without being harmed...like most people in this world.  Sure, there are a few members who preach hate, but that's true in almost every grou...

In Defense of...Cecil Rhodes?!

You all know Cecil Rhodes, right?  He was a British Imperialist (living from 1853-1902) who founded the De Beers diamond mining and trading company.  Just this morning, I came upon a post comparing him to Adolf Hitler, and claiming that Cecil Rhodes killed at least 60 million Africans.  It has been shared 99 times.  Here is the post: https://plus.google.com/+TonyJefferson/posts/CZ6HW3AxDo6 Unlike many, I decided to do some research on it.  That is my nature.  I don't accept things without evidence given, and even when no evidence is provided, I search for evidence.  If after looking, no evidence is forthcoming, then I discount the claim unless compelling evidence does surface.  After my research on this topic (taking up about an hour of my day and 28 open tabs on my browser...but still an enjoyable time because this is what I like to do), I found that my initial skepticism was well justified and that this comparison is incorrect.  Adolph H...

2020 Was (Will Be) An Inside Job

My Election Prediction: Trump will lose. I think that the collusion of corporate media with big tech is too powerful for the minds of regular people to resist. The propaganda was non-stop, and enough people have fallen for it. I think that without the censorship, and with a modicum of objectivity in the media, Trump would win. Sure, people have their own reasons for supporting both Trump and Biden (= not Trump). Some of those reasons on both sides are sound. But a decent percentage of people are mindless consumers of propaganda, and these people will ultimately decide the election. 2016 shocked the deep state and their corporate overlords, but since their stunning loss, they made sure to do everything in their power so as not to suffer a similar defeat this time. They covered all of their bases, along with the mouths of those whose speech they feared. Meanwhile, Americans as a group no longer really care about the freedom of speech, and many are lukewarm on the idea of America ...