Suicide Bomber Commits Terrorism Because Germany "Obstructs" Islam!

http://www.cnn.com/2016/07/24/world/ansbach-germany-blast

This is HILARIOUS. Sometimes you just have to laugh. You might think it's impolite to laugh after a terrorist attack. Well I think it's impolite to have let this man in in the first place. Anyway, this is, like, the fourth German terrorist attack in the past week or so...and not including the two recent terrorist attacks in France (the truck one, and the one killing the priest). The reason I'm laughing, though, is because this story DESTROYS the regressives' entire reason for being...namely that if you are "nice", then people will like you, and if you're "mean" then people will hate you. This is what they cherish more than truth...but truth just punched them in the face.

What do I mean? Well get this... The Muslim suicide bomber who pulled this off said that his attack was "an act of revenge against Germans, because they obstruct Islam." Wait... Let me get this straight. JUST in 2015 (not including any previous years), Germany took in OVER ONE MILLION MUSLIM REFUGEES...and yet "they obstruct Islam". You can clearly see into this person's mind. I might now remind you that Hungary built a wall and kept Muslims out, and it's doing quite well. It's safe and sound!

What SHOULD this teach regressives? Well, if they were logical and they could listen to reason, they would take away the idea that an increase of terrorism in the West is NOT due to "how much we disrespect Islam", but rather "how many Muslims we let in". We can respect Islam all we want and give in at every level...and let Muslims overrun the West. But I will tell you right now...if we do that, then terrorism will increase. If we keep them out, then terrorism will not increase (or will at least increase more slowly, as many are already in the West and they are pumping out kids at an amazing rate). In the end, like it or not, Hungary had the right idea. While the "loving", "tolerant" nations become violent hell-holes, the so-called "hateful", "intolerant" nations will do fine. I only use "hateful" and "intolerant" in the same way that regressives use those terms. What they mean by that is "not destroying your own culture for the sake of others who do not respect it". But that's too long and more complex of a topic, so many people just use "hateful" and "intolerant" as short-hand. Ironically, with the demographic shifts (and perhaps even the natives waking up), the rampant migration will only lead to more TRUE hate and intolerance.

Believe me that you will see MANY more terrorist attacks across France, Germany, Belgium, and lots more "loving" and "tolerant" nations. And I predict right now that the nations that haven't let in many Muslims will be - by and large - least affected by the coming violence. Feel free to come back in a few years and see if my prediction is right.

Sokal-style hoaxes work for religious postmodernists, but (post) modernism is the real hoax Modernism in art and architecture, and postmodernism in philosophy are, like religion, insults to human intelligence. Unfortunately, many people fall for their hollow propaganda. The "Sokal Affair" was a hoax whereby a man called Alan Sokal submitted a postmodern-sounding article to a postmodern journal. It turns out that the English you hear isn't just unintelligible to you, but it's unintelligible to the people at the journal as well. But if it's unintelligible, it must be profound, right? The journal quickly accepted it, not knowing that it was all fake B.S. They then got embarrassed when they were told that it was pompous-sounding drivel. Religion has done the same thing. When people can't understand something, they generally think it's much more profound than if they can understand it. If a priest speaks Latin, wears some weird costume, and sp...

The Islamic State has beheaded at least 21 Christians in Libya.

Whenever a Muslim brings up the Crusades, I have to laugh to myself. Christians have done horrible things, including in later crusades against Constantinople and the Cathars in particular. However, get this. The Islamic State militants said, "Safety for you crusaders is something you can only wish for" right before butchering Egyptian Christians. It seems that many Muslims haven't taken a single history class. If they had, they would have known that Christians existed in Egypt for 400 years before Islam. (Heck, they were even around to murder Hypatia, perhaps the last major ancient female philosopher.) It was the Muslims who were the "Crusaders"...yet almost nobody will admit to this. Muslims instigated a merciless war against Christian Egyptians until they were overcome and under Islamic domination. They did this to people across the world, from Spain to India...massacring any who resisted. They tried to destroy the Byzaintine Em...

In Defense of...Cecil Rhodes?!

You all know Cecil Rhodes, right? He was a British Imperialist (living from 1853-1902) who founded the De Beers diamond mining and trading company. Just this morning, I came upon a post comparing him to Adolf Hitler, and claiming that Cecil Rhodes killed at least 60 million Africans. It has been shared 99 times. Here is the post: https://plus.google.com/+TonyJefferson/posts/CZ6HW3AxDo6 Unlike many, I decided to do some research on it. That is my nature. I don't accept things without evidence given, and even when no evidence is provided, I search for evidence. If after looking, no evidence is forthcoming, then I discount the claim unless compelling evidence does surface. After my research on this topic (taking up about an hour of my day and 28 open tabs on my browser...but still an enjoyable time because this is what I like to do), I found that my initial skepticism was well justified and that this comparison is incorrect. Adolph H...

Odracirys

Search This Blog