Skip to main content

The Tolerant Person VS The Bigot

There once was a conversation between a tolerant person and a bigot.  Here is how it went down:

A: Have you seen the video "If You Are A Muslim, You Are Retarded!"?  It's spot on.

B: Are you serious?  That's hate speech!

A: What?  From what they believe, Muslims are proving that they are not intelligent, and their ideas clash with those of the Constitution.

B: You're being a total bigot!

A: Why?  Muslims respect Muhammad, who had no respect for women and other ethnic groups.

B: So you're claiming that a full quarter of the global population is dumb and/or evil?

A: Well, maybe not...but don't you see a problem with that mindset?

B: Absolutely not.  We should have tolerance for all kinds of people, no matter what they believe.

A: Then why did you share that article, "If You Tell Me You Are Supporting Trump, I Already Know Seven Things About You", with some of the things you know about Trump supporters being that they "have no class", "are either a racist, or at best, have no problem with racism", "have an issue with women", and "don’t believe in the Constitution."?  That's hate speech!

B: Because from what they believe, Trump supporters are proving that they are not intelligent, and their ideas clash with those of the Constitution.

A: You're being a total bigot!

B: Why?  Trump supporters respect Donald Trump, who had no respect for women and other ethnic groups.

A: So you're claiming that a full quarter of Americans are dumb and/or evil?

B: Of course!  A lot more than a quarter of Americans are dumb and evil!

A: Shouldn't we have tolerance for all kinds of people, no matter what they believe?

B: NO!  THEY'RE EVIL, EVIL, EVIL!!!

Written by Odracirys
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Sokal-style hoaxes work for religious postmodernists, but (post) modernism is the real hoax Modernism in art and architecture, and postmodernism in philosophy are, like religion, insults to human intelligence.  Unfortunately, many people fall for their hollow propaganda. The "Sokal Affair" was a hoax whereby a man called Alan Sokal submitted a postmodern-sounding article to a postmodern journal.  It turns out that the English you hear isn't just unintelligible to you, but it's unintelligible to the people at the journal as well.  But if it's unintelligible, it must be profound, right?  The journal quickly accepted it, not knowing that it was all fake B.S.  They then got embarrassed when they were told that it was pompous-sounding drivel. Religion has done the same thing.  When people can't understand something, they generally think it's much more profound than if they can understand it.  If a priest speaks Latin, wears some weird costume, and sp...
Post a Comment
Read more

The Islamic State has beheaded at least 21 Christians in Libya.

Whenever a Muslim brings up the Crusades, I have to laugh to myself.  Christians have done horrible things, including in later crusades against Constantinople and the Cathars in particular.  However, get this.  The Islamic State militants said, "Safety for you crusaders is something you can only wish for" right before butchering Egyptian Christians. It seems that many Muslims haven't taken a single history class.  If they had, they would have known that Christians existed in Egypt for 400 years before Islam.  (Heck, they were even around to murder Hypatia, perhaps the last major ancient female philosopher.)  It was the Muslims who were the "Crusaders"...yet almost nobody will admit to this.  Muslims instigated a merciless war against Christian Egyptians until they were overcome and under Islamic domination.  They did this to people across the world, from Spain to India...massacring any who resisted.  They tried to destroy the Byzaintine Em...
Post a Comment
Read more

2020 Was (Will Be) An Inside Job

My Election Prediction: Trump will lose. I think that the collusion of corporate media with big tech is too powerful for the minds of regular people to resist. The propaganda was non-stop, and enough people have fallen for it. I think that without the censorship, and with a modicum of objectivity in the media, Trump would win. Sure, people have their own reasons for supporting both Trump and Biden (= not Trump). Some of those reasons on both sides are sound. But a decent percentage of people are mindless consumers of propaganda, and these people will ultimately decide the election. 2016 shocked the deep state and their corporate overlords, but since their stunning loss, they made sure to do everything in their power so as not to suffer a similar defeat this time. They covered all of their bases, along with the mouths of those whose speech they feared. Meanwhile, Americans as a group no longer really care about the freedom of speech, and many are lukewarm on the idea of America ...
Post a Comment
Read more