Skip to main content

Pick Only The Side Of Reason

You've probably already heard about the shooting of Republicans at a baseball game.  I still haven't really looked into it much, but I decided to post this just to say that I saw this coming.  When I heard that a congressman had been shot, I asked, "Was it a Republican?"  Sure enough, it was.

http://www.miamiherald.com/news/nation-world/article156183584.html

In 2009 and thereabouts, things would have been different.  I would have expected the victim to be a Democrat.  Sure enough, Gabrielle Giffords was shot.  That was a time when certain Republicans in the base were calling Obama the "Antichrist".  Now is a different time, with leftists seething with more hatred than I've ever seen, even from right-wingers.  While Obama was the "Antichrist", Trump is "Neo-Hitler".  Although I've been disappointed with both the Antichrist and Neo-Hitler, I'm still not ashamed that I voted for them over their rivals, who were truly elitist hacks.  I'd rather shake things up and put a frown on the face of the irrational hate-mongers...no matter what side they're on.

But certainly, as I mentioned, it is the left that has gone off the deep end over the past few years, and particularly after Neo-Hitler came to power.  I don't doubt for a second that the mainstreaming of Kathy Griffin's "Trump beheading" photo shoot and Central Park's "Let's Kill Trump!" Quasi-Shakespearean play helped push this to the boiling point.  In fact, in a recent video by "Atheism is Unstoppable", he shows that "The Young Turks" in fact radicalized people to kill police officers.  Another warning sign was the embracing of the idea of "Punching Nazis" and then the labeling of literally everyone who is not a Social Justice Warrior (including feminist Laci Green) as a "Nazi".

I am the sort of person who does not pick a side.  I do my own thing and I gain more or less respect for those who do what I believe to be right.  If some person or some side does something that I do not believe to be right, I will be against them...no matter which side it is.  This is what most people don't understand.  Most people follow a group and stick up for that group.  I'm proud to say that in my life, I have never had a role model.  Role models are totally unnecessary and in fact that idea should not exist.  Logic should be the sole arbiter that dictates what is right.  If you have a "side" or a "role model", then you will be put in the position of defending them even if they do something that you would normally find to be wrong.  I judge groups and individuals based on how "right" they are, and I determine what is right by logic.  That is the only rational way to do it.  Otherwise, you are picking a group or individual and forgoing your own sense of right in order to become a mindless follower.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Fighting Klanophobia I'm always hurt when I see bigots offend groups of people.  All too often, people paint a group, "the other" with a broad brush and stereotype them as being evil, even though the crimes that are associated with them are only committed by a tiny minority fringe element within the larger group. Such is the case with the Ku Klux Klan.  Most people don't like to associate with them.  There is a lot of prejudice directed towards that group, particularly among blacks and Jews, but this hate is widespread.  If you see a klansman wearing his cultural garb, how do you feel?  Do you become nervous?  Do you think that he'll do something violent?  If so, you're part of the problem. The KKK is an organization of peace.  Most of its members are peaceful and only want to go about their lives without being harmed...like most people in this world.  Sure, there are a few members who preach hate, but that's true in almost every grou...

The Islamic State has beheaded at least 21 Christians in Libya.

Whenever a Muslim brings up the Crusades, I have to laugh to myself.  Christians have done horrible things, including in later crusades against Constantinople and the Cathars in particular.  However, get this.  The Islamic State militants said, "Safety for you crusaders is something you can only wish for" right before butchering Egyptian Christians. It seems that many Muslims haven't taken a single history class.  If they had, they would have known that Christians existed in Egypt for 400 years before Islam.  (Heck, they were even around to murder Hypatia, perhaps the last major ancient female philosopher.)  It was the Muslims who were the "Crusaders"...yet almost nobody will admit to this.  Muslims instigated a merciless war against Christian Egyptians until they were overcome and under Islamic domination.  They did this to people across the world, from Spain to India...massacring any who resisted.  They tried to destroy the Byzaintine Em...
Sokal-style hoaxes work for religious postmodernists, but (post) modernism is the real hoax Modernism in art and architecture, and postmodernism in philosophy are, like religion, insults to human intelligence.  Unfortunately, many people fall for their hollow propaganda. The "Sokal Affair" was a hoax whereby a man called Alan Sokal submitted a postmodern-sounding article to a postmodern journal.  It turns out that the English you hear isn't just unintelligible to you, but it's unintelligible to the people at the journal as well.  But if it's unintelligible, it must be profound, right?  The journal quickly accepted it, not knowing that it was all fake B.S.  They then got embarrassed when they were told that it was pompous-sounding drivel. Religion has done the same thing.  When people can't understand something, they generally think it's much more profound than if they can understand it.  If a priest speaks Latin, wears some weird costume, and sp...