Skip to main content

UK Refuses Asylum for Asia Bibi, an ACTUAL Asylum-Seeker

U.K. refuses asylum for Asia Bibi, fearing Muslim 'unrest'
https://mobile.wnd.com/2018/11/u-k-refuses-asylum-for-asia-bibi-fearing-muslim-unrest/#O1Ve5Pjue5wOkpVW.99 (Via +Fidem Turbāre on Google+)

___________________________

Just in case you thought that the so-called "progressive" overlords of the Western world had any interest in helping actual "refugees" and "asylum seekers", here is all the proof you need to know that that is not the case.

Asia Bibi was jailed in Pakistan for the high crime of being a Christian (also known as "blasphemy"), and sentenced to death by hanging.  She has spent time in jail since at least 2010, but the Supreme Court overturned the case, and she should be released after the verdict is reviewed during "a process that can take years"...

Murderous Muslims have decided to take the "law" into their own hand, by killing her soon after she is finally released, so she appealed for asylum in the UK.  However, the UK has rejected her appeal for asylum.  Will THEY be called "racist" for not taking in one person who will almost definitely be killed and is an actual, rare, LEGITIMATE asylum seeker?  Of course not.  Only people who speak against economic migrants who are at no more risk of danger in their home countries than the average person in that country, and who do not apply for asylum in their own countries but secretly break the law to cross the border illegally and then claim asylum if they end up being caught, and come by the tens of thousands or hundreds of thousands every year...only people who speak against them face any consequences.

Why is this the case?  Well, if you think people in charge are having these things happen because they are "good people", I can only chuckle in a kind of depressed way.  No naive...  Young one...you will soon learn that "truly good people" are a rare commodity.  Most people do things for some kind of benefit - oftentimes PR purposes or "virtue signaling" at best, and depressing wages or hatred of the current majority and desire to increase your base for political gain at worst.  Why would taking in Asia Bibi not be a case of "good PR" and "virtue signaling"?  Because it might make Muslims mad.  And any calculating person who is not actually a good person but "plays one on TV" would calculate that the risk of actually doing something good pales in comparison to the risk of pissing off Muslims...who are, of course, said to be peaceful and pose no risk to our societies...although the way people ACT tells you SO much more than what they SAY.

Shame on the UK.  Let her come to the US.  Hopefully, we can be a beacon for the persecuted.


Labels

Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

In Defense of...Cecil Rhodes?!

You all know Cecil Rhodes, right?  He was a British Imperialist (living from 1853-1902) who founded the De Beers diamond mining and trading company.  Just this morning, I came upon a post comparing him to Adolf Hitler, and claiming that Cecil Rhodes killed at least 60 million Africans.  It has been shared 99 times.  Here is the post: https://plus.google.com/+TonyJefferson/posts/CZ6HW3AxDo6 Unlike many, I decided to do some research on it.  That is my nature.  I don't accept things without evidence given, and even when no evidence is provided, I search for evidence.  If after looking, no evidence is forthcoming, then I discount the claim unless compelling evidence does surface.  After my research on this topic (taking up about an hour of my day and 28 open tabs on my browser...but still an enjoyable time because this is what I like to do), I found that my initial skepticism was well justified and that this comparison is incorrect.  Adolph H...
3 comments
Read more

The Dark Side of the Women's March

The recent Women's March, which took place in Washington and numerous other cities one day after the inauguration of President Trump, may go down as the largest protest in American history. Millions showed up to these events to advocate for women's issues and to protest against Donald Trump. While very few would find fault in a women's march in and of itself, upon inspecting this women's march further, some disturbing information comes to light. The Women's March was thankfully quite peaceful, unlike Inauguration Day when the group Antifa (the "anti-fascists"), although stymied by the police, were ironically able to carry out their own mini "Kristallnacht" (or rather, "Kristalltag"), smashing windows and setting fires in broad daylight. The Women's March appears to have been non-violent and there were apparently no arrests. However, problems start to manifest themselves when we look at the people who set up and spoke at th...
1 comment
Read more

Inconvenient History – The Barbary Slave Trade

Once upon a time, slavers ravaged the coastal towns of the European continent. Eventually, the response to that would include clear proof that the United States is not founded on a religion. Soon thereafter, European imperialism would become the driving force for the abolition of slavery around the world. Continue reading to learn more. The Barbary Slave Trade is a relatively small part of the Arab Slave Trade, which itself is only one part of the Islamic Slave Trade (which besides Arab slavers, includes Turks enslaving Europeans and Africans, Muslim invaders of India and Sub-Saharan Africa, Malay enslavers of local minorities, and other Islamic slavers). For example, the Arab Slave Trade may have enslaved up to 18 million people over its span (not including those born enslaved), while the Barbary Slave Trade enslaved some number over 1 million. Bear in mind that this number is three times the number of enslaved people (roughly 388 thousand) sent to the area of the United Sta...
Post a Comment
Read more