(Many) Illegal Migrants are Ruining our Countries

Pictured is Little Afghanistan in Calais, France. The people inside that hovel are obviously proud of their home country (and support it more than France or Britain), and have successfully taken their home country with them. Instead of trying to integrate with the local population, they are making their host countries more like the countries they escaped from. I hope the irony is not lost on you. These parasites are trying to make our countries just like the countries they had to run away from! And neither they nor many of us can even see that blatantly obvious fact!

There are now thousands of illegal immigrants everyday trying their best to get across the English Channel (via the "Chunnel"). They are making life miserable for those legally crossing from France to Britain. It is like a refugee crisis. But they are already in France, and they are trying their best to leave it. It proves that they are totally hopeless as people.

To the illegal migrants, I'm sorry to break it to you, but if you can't make a decent living in France, you can't make a decent living anywhere. New Little Afghanistan tent cities will pop up all over and will never disappear, because the problem is not your countries. The problem is your culture. The problem is YOU. Until you throw your inferior culture away, you will only destroy us. If that is your goal, you are doing a fine job. If it is not your goal, then either go back home or change your culture, because many of us in civilized countries are tired of putting up with your shit.

Quick Tip: Type "Calais Eurostar" into Google, and you may just see the station "Gare Calais Frethun" pop up, and the picture for it is a Qur'an. Try it!
https://www.google.com/webhp?hl=en#hl=en&q=Calais+Eurostar

To those in civilized countries who think that illegal immigrants should be allowed to stay, and should not be forcibly stopped from entering, I have this idea. Let an immigrant stay with you, and you support that immigrant with your own money until that immigrant can contribute to society. You do that first, then you can lecture us. In fact, I will soon be able to lecture you. I persuaded one legal immigrant (of another race, language, and culture) to settle in my home country, and next year, I intend to sponsor, invite to live with me, and monetarily support another potential legal immigrant (again, of another race, a still different language from the first one, and of a different culture from the first one). I am doing this because this one immigrant and the other potential immigrant are going to add to my country and my life, not detract from it. And when it comes down to it, the people already here should have a choice about whether to invite others in or not.

Really, the problem is not with the immigrants so much as the people in civilized countries who do nothing to stop them. I can understand why someone would want to get more money elsewhere. I CAN'T understand why some liberals would be happy to see their own culture overtaken by those who are by and large more conservative than homegrown conservatives. If the West is dying, it is due to suicide more than anything else. When you are so radical as to think that your body's immune system is the bad guy and should be abolished, then you deserve to die from disease...but those without that opinion don't deserve to be taken along with them.

The photo shown in my post is from this news article from The Independent:
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/pictures/calais-crisis-intensifies--in-pictures-10427195.html

In Defense of...Cecil Rhodes?!

You all know Cecil Rhodes, right? He was a British Imperialist (living from 1853-1902) who founded the De Beers diamond mining and trading company. Just this morning, I came upon a post comparing him to Adolf Hitler, and claiming that Cecil Rhodes killed at least 60 million Africans. It has been shared 99 times. Here is the post: https://plus.google.com/+TonyJefferson/posts/CZ6HW3AxDo6 Unlike many, I decided to do some research on it. That is my nature. I don't accept things without evidence given, and even when no evidence is provided, I search for evidence. If after looking, no evidence is forthcoming, then I discount the claim unless compelling evidence does surface. After my research on this topic (taking up about an hour of my day and 28 open tabs on my browser...but still an enjoyable time because this is what I like to do), I found that my initial skepticism was well justified and that this comparison is incorrect. Adolph H...

Inconvenient History – The Barbary Slave Trade

Once upon a time, slavers ravaged the coastal towns of the European continent. Eventually, the response to that would include clear proof that the United States is not founded on a religion. Soon thereafter, European imperialism would become the driving force for the abolition of slavery around the world. Continue reading to learn more. The Barbary Slave Trade is a relatively small part of the Arab Slave Trade, which itself is only one part of the Islamic Slave Trade (which besides Arab slavers, includes Turks enslaving Europeans and Africans, Muslim invaders of India and Sub-Saharan Africa, Malay enslavers of local minorities, and other Islamic slavers). For example, the Arab Slave Trade may have enslaved up to 18 million people over its span (not including those born enslaved), while the Barbary Slave Trade enslaved some number over 1 million. Bear in mind that this number is three times the number of enslaved people (roughly 388 thousand) sent to the area of the United Sta...

My Russian and Ukrainian Referenda if I were US President

If I were president of the United States, I would have a referenda created online...very basic ones that anyone could technically vote on. They would be for Chukotka, Kamchatka, Magadan, Khabarovsk, Sakhalin, and Primorski Krai...the Russian regions bordering the Pacific Ocean. An example referendum would be such: 1) Do you certify that you are a citizen of (Kamchatka, etc)? 2) Do you wish that your region will leave Russia and join the United States? (Yes) (No) Obviously, people online would be honest about the first question, and then we'd see the percentage answering "Yes" on the second question. The referendum would be open for a few days, and after that, it would be determined whether any of these regions voted to join the US. Obviously, as president, I would not have the power to annex other regions (and the referenda would be as legitimate as the Russian ones...meaning not legitimate)...BUT...I would move warships and landing ships near the Russian Pacific co...

Odracirys

Search This Blog