Propaganda in the West

We take it for granted that the media can't be trusted in countries which are not "free". However, there is no doubt that what we read in so-called "free" countries is also heavily biased, and has an agenda. I'm not just talking about the most blatant sources such as Fox News. I'm talking about nearly everything.

Each news outlet has an agenda. They pick sides. It is often great to pick sides. For example, supporting the fact that humans are changing the earth's climate is what news outlets should be doing because all of the evidence points to that. When problems arise is when news outlets pick a side and then go with it, no matter the countervailing evidence. Some of it might be related to pleasing the "free" governments that look over them, and some of it might be due to one of the most destructive beliefs ever - that good always battles bad (and thus, "bad" and "bad" or "bad" and "worse" never fight). I can say that Assad is not good in that no way would I want him in charge of the country I live in. However, he might be better than the alternative. And make no mistake. Terrorist groups would overcome the Free Syrian Army if Assad ever fell.

For one common example of propaganda, look at this quote from an article at the Christian Science Monitor, "Why ISIS gains in Iraq are reshaping Syrian regime's war strategy" (LINK). There are some rather dubious claims in it. For example:

Although sworn enemies on paper, ISIS has largely refrained from fighting the Syrian regime to focus on building an Islamic state in northern Syria and ousting more moderate rebel rivals. In return, the regime has left ISIS alone, allowing the Syrian military to concentrate on fighting the moderate rebel groups. At the same time, Assad also points to the brutal exploits of ISIS and other jihadist groups in the conflict to justify its argument to the international community that it is fighting Islamic “terrorists.”

This is completely false. This article makes it seem like the Syrian government hasn't been fighting ISIS. It has...and in fact, ISIS controls more land in Syria than any other rebel group. I don't think that Assad just decided to let a Sunni group dedicated to the genocide of Alawites gain control over such a large portion of the nation. Do you? Take a look at the map below (from June 6th, 2014):

http://blog.foreignpolicy.com/files/fp_uploaded_images/140611_syriagranularCROP.png

The red is the Syrian government. The black is ISIS. The yellow are Kurdish rebel groups. And the light green?...The light green is "the rest of the rebels", and combines the Free Syrian Army, Al-Nusra Front (a terrorist organization and branch of Al-Qaeda), and the Islamic Front. Granted, the Western area is more populated, but we can't say that the fight has mostly been between the Syrian regime and the Free Syrian Army when as you can see, there are so many factions involved.

If you read lots of news articles, you might notice something. Terrorists attack the United States, the UK, and Spain. However, "terrorists" attack China, Russia, and Syria. Do you know why "terrorists" is in quotation marks? Because they're not REAL terrorists. They're freedom fighters, of course! So when "terrorists" kill 400 civilians in a giant blast in Damascus, you can rest assured that the civilians had it coming.

I've started getting into reading "Yahoo! News", as there are articles from various outlets but anyone on Yahoo! can comment. Thus, there are active discussions after each article, and they are often more interesting than the articles themselves. There are lots of crazy people, as can be expected. You can find "Thanks to Obummer, the Muslim!" and such things. However, on the article above, at least two comments called out the bias. You can find some perceptive people.

There are also funny people who comment. One comment (by "Mexican Craftsman") on an Associated Press article (on Yahoo! News) entitled "Signs of reprisal killings emerge in Iraq" (LINK) said, "Can we not tell the Chinese that Muslims taste like chicken and leave you with a 4 hour stiffy! They will mow thru them in a matter of months." Not the most politically correct words ever written, and in fact quite offensive to all groups that are mentioned, but I must say I did get a chuckle out of it. And sometimes, a chuckle is what you need.

In Defense of...Cecil Rhodes?!

You all know Cecil Rhodes, right? He was a British Imperialist (living from 1853-1902) who founded the De Beers diamond mining and trading company. Just this morning, I came upon a post comparing him to Adolf Hitler, and claiming that Cecil Rhodes killed at least 60 million Africans. It has been shared 99 times. Here is the post: https://plus.google.com/+TonyJefferson/posts/CZ6HW3AxDo6 Unlike many, I decided to do some research on it. That is my nature. I don't accept things without evidence given, and even when no evidence is provided, I search for evidence. If after looking, no evidence is forthcoming, then I discount the claim unless compelling evidence does surface. After my research on this topic (taking up about an hour of my day and 28 open tabs on my browser...but still an enjoyable time because this is what I like to do), I found that my initial skepticism was well justified and that this comparison is incorrect. Adolph Hitler and Cecil Rhodes cannot be compare

Inconvenient History – The Barbary Slave Trade

Once upon a time, slavers ravaged the coastal towns of the European continent. Eventually, the response to that would include clear proof that the United States is not founded on a religion. Soon thereafter, European imperialism would become the driving force for the abolition of slavery around the world. Continue reading to learn more. The Barbary Slave Trade is a relatively small part of the Arab Slave Trade, which itself is only one part of the Islamic Slave Trade (which besides Arab slavers, includes Turks enslaving Europeans and Africans, Muslim invaders of India and Sub-Saharan Africa, Malay enslavers of local minorities, and other Islamic slavers). For example, the Arab Slave Trade may have enslaved up to 18 million people over its span (not including those born enslaved), while the Barbary Slave Trade enslaved some number over 1 million. Bear in mind that this number is three times the number of enslaved people (roughly 388 thousand) sent to the area of the United Sta

The Sixth Great Mass Extinction and Human Survival

Recently, there have been numerous articles about a study showing that we are in the midst of the Earth's sixth great mass extinction. Below are some quotes, and then I will give my thoughts. "Miami (AFP) - The world is embarking on its sixth mass extinction with animals disappearing about 100 times faster than they used to, scientists warned Friday, and humans could be among the first victims." "Not since the age of the dinosaurs ended 66 million years ago has the planet been losing species at this rapid a rate, said a study led by experts at Stanford University, Princeton University and the University of California, Berkeley." "The study "shows without any significant doubt that we are now entering the sixth great mass extinction event," said co-author Paul Ehrlich, a Stanford University professor of biology." http://news.yahoo.com/sixth-mass-extinction-us-study-210749359.html This is sad, although it's not news. I

Odracirys

Search This Blog