Skip to main content

The Most Evil Empire That Has Ever Existed

In the 11th edition of the Encyclopedia Britannica (1911), the first paragraph for the article "British Empire" states:

"BRITISH EMPIRE, the name now loosely given to the whole aggregate of territory, the inhabitants of which, under various forms of government, ultimately look to the British crown as the supreme head. The term 'empire' is in this connexion obviously used rather for convenience than in any sense equivalent to that of the older or despotic empires of history."

Some might chuckle at this description while noting that the British had quite a high opinion of themselves.  Of course, in some sense, the empire was despotic...not in the sense that there was one tyrant in charge of it, but rather that only a minority of people in the empire were able to participate democratically in it.

Yet with a short memory, society has pretty much forgotten about the atrocities committed by the empires that the British encyclopedia writers might have been alluding to.  Of course, throughout the Empire, the British at least wanted to see themselves as the "good guys".  Many other empires had no such desire.  Some wanted to be so cruel as to strike fear into hear hearts of people just from hearing their name.  One comes to my mind, but it has somehow been forgotten in the course of history.

So, what do you think is the cruelest empire...the most evil empire that has ever existed?  Take a few seconds right now to think.  You might say that Nazi Germany was the most evil empire.  It is hard to disagree with that, yet I don't think that the Third Reich was the worst.  If you read or listen to history, you'll find worse ones...and horrifyingly, you'll find ones that WON, and had carte blanche to shape the world.  Of course, saying that one empire is the "most evil" is not meant to diminish the amount of suffering inflicted by other empires.  To be sure, if I were set to be exterminated in a Nazi death camp, I might not say, "Well, the Nazis aren't so bad comparatively."  No.  Of course not.  We know that every empire (and nation) has had atrocities committed by those working for it, and I can understand the opinion of anyone who has been on the receiving end.  Any empire can be the worst to someone.  But I want to talk about the most evil empire I know of.

Was it the Spanish Empire?  This was one of the original empires of the European "Age of Discovery".  Spain and Portugal got other countries like Britain and the Netherlands into the game.  These latecomers didn't want to lose out, because for a while, it seemed like Spain and Portugal had partitioned the world between them and were going to be the mightiest realms on earth if their expansion wasn't checked.  Christopher Columbus (a Genoan) explored the New World through Spanish financing.  Disease and slavery subsequently led to the deaths of millions of people.  Again, if I were on the receiving end, I would no doubt have said that the Spanish were the worst.  And unlike the Nazis, they won.

 However, the world today is too Eurocentric...not only with the good, but with the bad.  Some ignorant people's view of history is "In the beginning, Europeans did bad stuff to everyone else (and each other)."  When you think like that, you are not only throwing out thousands of years of history, but are also forgetting history contemporary with European expansion, that was happening elsewhere.

And so we come to the cruelest empire that has ever existed - the Mongols.  As far as we know, there was absolutely no pretension of benevolence.  Even most other horrible empires fought for something.  If we let empires speak for themselves, they will probably tell you what they were fighting for (even though these were often just excuses).  The British fought to enlighten the world.  The Spanish fought to spread Christianity.  The Caliphates fought to spread Islam.  The Nazis fought to destroy the plague of Bolshevism and rid the world of "Jewish influence".  Of course, vast riches and lands were always sought after by all of these empires, but it was hard for them to admit it to themselves.  The Mongols, on the other hand, didn't need to justify their expansion.  They expanded because they loved to kill and rape.  If there was a Mongol charter, it wouldn't say: "Our mission is to spread X Religion to the savage peoples."  Their mission would say: "We are a savage people who enjoy murder, and want loot.  It makes us happy to rape and murder people."  It was that simple.

You may think I'm overdoing it.  I'm not.  Without doubt, I'm not trying to cast aspersions at most people currently living in the nation of Mongolia.  I am only stating the truth of what the Mongol Empire(s) were like.

The Mongols were an empire more than a people.  They started out as Mongolians, but quickly incorporated Turkic tribes.  Genghis Khan was shamanistic (and might have thought of himself as a god or prophet).  Timur the Lame (Tamerlane), who was born over 100 years after Genghis Khan died, was a fierce Muslim.  (In fact, the "Mughals" are descended from the "Mongols" - and the names have the same origin.)  Yet there seems to have been very little in the way of personality differences between these men.  (Although the later Mughals had much more of a Persian culture than a Mongol culture.)

Now let me introduce what I think is the best historical rundown of the Mongols out there.  It's by Dan Carlin, who has two podcast shows - "Common Sense", and "Hardcore History".  Dan Carlin has a series of podcasts about the Mongol Empire.  If you're interested in learning more about this empire, you NEED to check out his podcasts.  They will inform you in an entertaining yet serious way like nothing else.  I have done (amateur) research on the Mongols (via Wikipedia and other sources), so I already knew about the Mongols, but this man sets everything out there and gives you the truth that many think is too hard to hear.  I have only listened to the first two parts so far, but I'll definitely continue the series.  These are perfect for when you just want to lie down and listen to something (like an audio book), or if you're exercising and want some interesting mental stimulation at the same time.  Check it out!  A link to the Hardcore History archive is below:

http://www.dancarlin.com/disp.php/hharchive

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

In Defense of...Cecil Rhodes?!

You all know Cecil Rhodes, right?  He was a British Imperialist (living from 1853-1902) who founded the De Beers diamond mining and trading company.  Just this morning, I came upon a post comparing him to Adolf Hitler, and claiming that Cecil Rhodes killed at least 60 million Africans.  It has been shared 99 times.  Here is the post: https://plus.google.com/+TonyJefferson/posts/CZ6HW3AxDo6 Unlike many, I decided to do some research on it.  That is my nature.  I don't accept things without evidence given, and even when no evidence is provided, I search for evidence.  If after looking, no evidence is forthcoming, then I discount the claim unless compelling evidence does surface.  After my research on this topic (taking up about an hour of my day and 28 open tabs on my browser...but still an enjoyable time because this is what I like to do), I found that my initial skepticism was well justified and that this comparison is incorrect.  Adolph Hitler and Cecil Rhodes cannot be compare

Inconvenient History – The Barbary Slave Trade

Once upon a time, slavers ravaged the coastal towns of the European continent. Eventually, the response to that would include clear proof that the United States is not founded on a religion. Soon thereafter, European imperialism would become the driving force for the abolition of slavery around the world. Continue reading to learn more. The Barbary Slave Trade is a relatively small part of the Arab Slave Trade, which itself is only one part of the Islamic Slave Trade (which besides Arab slavers, includes Turks enslaving Europeans and Africans, Muslim invaders of India and Sub-Saharan Africa, Malay enslavers of local minorities, and other Islamic slavers). For example, the Arab Slave Trade may have enslaved up to 18 million people over its span (not including those born enslaved), while the Barbary Slave Trade enslaved some number over 1 million. Bear in mind that this number is three times the number of enslaved people (roughly 388 thousand) sent to the area of the United Sta

The Sixth Great Mass Extinction and Human Survival

Recently, there have been numerous articles about a study showing that we are in the midst of the Earth's sixth great mass extinction.  Below are some quotes, and then I will give my thoughts. "Miami (AFP) - The world is embarking on its sixth mass extinction with animals disappearing about 100 times faster than they used to, scientists warned Friday, and humans could be among the first victims." "Not since the age of the dinosaurs ended 66 million years ago has the planet been losing species at this rapid a rate, said a study led by experts at Stanford University, Princeton University and the University of California, Berkeley." "The study "shows without any significant doubt that we are now entering the sixth great mass extinction event," said co-author Paul Ehrlich, a Stanford University professor of biology." http://news.yahoo.com/sixth-mass-extinction-us-study-210749359.html This is sad, although it's not news.  I