Skip to main content

More Propaganda in the West

In case you missed my first installment of "Propaganda in the West", here is a link:
http://odracirys.blogspot.com/2014/06/propaganda-in-west.html

If you read that, you will notice that I'm not saying that the West has the most propaganda.  Far from it.  However, it does exist and I often notice it.  Therefore, I like to call it out once in a while.

This installment focuses on the article, "Pentagon cites 'dangerous' Chinese jet intercept".
(http://news.yahoo.com/pentagon-cites-dangerous-chinese-jet-intercept-165354051--politics.html)

This was a news story about China, and even before I read it, I knew that it was going to be an American overreaction to something either trivial, or something that would have been called a Chinese provocation if the tables were turned.  The US media loves making China into the bad guy, no matter what the truth of the matter is.  Sometimes, China is the bad guy and deserves the criticism it gets.  However, that does not excuse those who criticize China over nothing.  Unfortunately, those stories seem to be more common.

Let's look at the beginning of the article and put the provocative statements into more objective words.

"The Obama administration on Friday accused a Chinese fighter jet of conducting a 'dangerous intercept' of a U.S. Navy surveillance and reconnaissance aircraft off the coast of China in international airspace — the fourth such incident since March."

OK, China certainly sounds like the bad guy, but what objectively happened in this situation?  Well, a Chinese fighter jet intercepted (not shot down, just intercepted) a US Navy spy plane (that's what "surveillance and reconnaissance aircraft" means) off the coast of China.  "International airspace" is airspace over a country and its territorial waters.  According to Wikipedia, territorial waters extend "at most 12 nautical miles (22.2 km; 13.8 mi) from the baseline (usually the mean low-water mark) of a coastal state."

In other words, a US spy plane was flying perhaps as close as 23 kilometers from the coast of China.  Maybe it was more, but my guess is that it was gathering data, so it probably wasn't very far away.  The first thing that pops into my mind is "what if the roles were reversed".  If a Chinese spy plane were collecting data just off the coast of the United States, what would happen then?  Probably an intercept.  I don't know how "dangerous" it would be (the article said that the Chinese jet "did a 'barrel roll' maneuver over the top of the Poseidon at one point and also passed across the nose of the Navy plane, exposing the belly of the fighter in a way apparently designed to show that it was armed").

It's funny that many people commenting on the article said, "We should have shot that Chinese jet down!"  (I don't know how a spy plane would shoot down a fighter jet, but anyway, that was their thought.)  Yet if a Chinese spy plane ever came near the US coast (while staying in international waters), I'm quite sure that they would give the same response - "We should have shot that Chinese jet down!"  However, they can't conceive of how the Chinese might feel in either of those situations.

I try to be objective in everything that I do, but lots of people out there (all around the world) aren't, and they can find whatever news they like to feed them what they want to believe.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Sokal-style hoaxes work for religious postmodernists, but (post) modernism is the real hoax Modernism in art and architecture, and postmodernism in philosophy are, like religion, insults to human intelligence.  Unfortunately, many people fall for their hollow propaganda. The "Sokal Affair" was a hoax whereby a man called Alan Sokal submitted a postmodern-sounding article to a postmodern journal.  It turns out that the English you hear isn't just unintelligible to you, but it's unintelligible to the people at the journal as well.  But if it's unintelligible, it must be profound, right?  The journal quickly accepted it, not knowing that it was all fake B.S.  They then got embarrassed when they were told that it was pompous-sounding drivel. Religion has done the same thing.  When people can't understand something, they generally think it's much more profound than if they can understand it.  If a priest speaks Latin, wears some weird costume, and sp...

The Islamic State has beheaded at least 21 Christians in Libya.

Whenever a Muslim brings up the Crusades, I have to laugh to myself.  Christians have done horrible things, including in later crusades against Constantinople and the Cathars in particular.  However, get this.  The Islamic State militants said, "Safety for you crusaders is something you can only wish for" right before butchering Egyptian Christians. It seems that many Muslims haven't taken a single history class.  If they had, they would have known that Christians existed in Egypt for 400 years before Islam.  (Heck, they were even around to murder Hypatia, perhaps the last major ancient female philosopher.)  It was the Muslims who were the "Crusaders"...yet almost nobody will admit to this.  Muslims instigated a merciless war against Christian Egyptians until they were overcome and under Islamic domination.  They did this to people across the world, from Spain to India...massacring any who resisted.  They tried to destroy the Byzaintine Em...

I Feel Used!

The Justice Department just indicted 13 Russian nationals who were caught indoctrinating the US public!  This is one of their social media posts/adverts, and I am ashamed to say that I ACTUALLY FELL FOR IT!  Those damn Russkies played me for a fool! When I saw this post, it just spoke to me in a way in which nothing else had.  I had never so clearly linked Hillary Clinton with Satan, and Donald Trump with Jesus before.  This post gave me that false impression, though.  I promptly sold my "I'm with Her" T-shirt and cleansed my body with holy water.  I held my rosary in my hand and begged forgiveness.  Then, I went to the voting booth and voted for Trump.  After all, I could not let Satan win. But now, I learn that it was Russians behind the whole thing!  Now, the evidence that Hillary Clinton was in league with the Prince of Darkness is not as water-tight as I may have believed before.  Now, I realize that I stood for everything that ...