Skip to main content

More Propaganda in the West

In case you missed my first installment of "Propaganda in the West", here is a link:
http://odracirys.blogspot.com/2014/06/propaganda-in-west.html

If you read that, you will notice that I'm not saying that the West has the most propaganda.  Far from it.  However, it does exist and I often notice it.  Therefore, I like to call it out once in a while.

This installment focuses on the article, "Pentagon cites 'dangerous' Chinese jet intercept".
(http://news.yahoo.com/pentagon-cites-dangerous-chinese-jet-intercept-165354051--politics.html)

This was a news story about China, and even before I read it, I knew that it was going to be an American overreaction to something either trivial, or something that would have been called a Chinese provocation if the tables were turned.  The US media loves making China into the bad guy, no matter what the truth of the matter is.  Sometimes, China is the bad guy and deserves the criticism it gets.  However, that does not excuse those who criticize China over nothing.  Unfortunately, those stories seem to be more common.

Let's look at the beginning of the article and put the provocative statements into more objective words.

"The Obama administration on Friday accused a Chinese fighter jet of conducting a 'dangerous intercept' of a U.S. Navy surveillance and reconnaissance aircraft off the coast of China in international airspace — the fourth such incident since March."

OK, China certainly sounds like the bad guy, but what objectively happened in this situation?  Well, a Chinese fighter jet intercepted (not shot down, just intercepted) a US Navy spy plane (that's what "surveillance and reconnaissance aircraft" means) off the coast of China.  "International airspace" is airspace over a country and its territorial waters.  According to Wikipedia, territorial waters extend "at most 12 nautical miles (22.2 km; 13.8 mi) from the baseline (usually the mean low-water mark) of a coastal state."

In other words, a US spy plane was flying perhaps as close as 23 kilometers from the coast of China.  Maybe it was more, but my guess is that it was gathering data, so it probably wasn't very far away.  The first thing that pops into my mind is "what if the roles were reversed".  If a Chinese spy plane were collecting data just off the coast of the United States, what would happen then?  Probably an intercept.  I don't know how "dangerous" it would be (the article said that the Chinese jet "did a 'barrel roll' maneuver over the top of the Poseidon at one point and also passed across the nose of the Navy plane, exposing the belly of the fighter in a way apparently designed to show that it was armed").

It's funny that many people commenting on the article said, "We should have shot that Chinese jet down!"  (I don't know how a spy plane would shoot down a fighter jet, but anyway, that was their thought.)  Yet if a Chinese spy plane ever came near the US coast (while staying in international waters), I'm quite sure that they would give the same response - "We should have shot that Chinese jet down!"  However, they can't conceive of how the Chinese might feel in either of those situations.

I try to be objective in everything that I do, but lots of people out there (all around the world) aren't, and they can find whatever news they like to feed them what they want to believe.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

In Defense of...Cecil Rhodes?!

You all know Cecil Rhodes, right?  He was a British Imperialist (living from 1853-1902) who founded the De Beers diamond mining and trading company.  Just this morning, I came upon a post comparing him to Adolf Hitler, and claiming that Cecil Rhodes killed at least 60 million Africans.  It has been shared 99 times.  Here is the post: https://plus.google.com/+TonyJefferson/posts/CZ6HW3AxDo6 Unlike many, I decided to do some research on it.  That is my nature.  I don't accept things without evidence given, and even when no evidence is provided, I search for evidence.  If after looking, no evidence is forthcoming, then I discount the claim unless compelling evidence does surface.  After my research on this topic (taking up about an hour of my day and 28 open tabs on my browser...but still an enjoyable time because this is what I like to do), I found that my initial skepticism was well justified and that this comparison is incorrect.  Adolph Hitler and Cecil Rhodes cannot be compare

Inconvenient History – The Barbary Slave Trade

Once upon a time, slavers ravaged the coastal towns of the European continent. Eventually, the response to that would include clear proof that the United States is not founded on a religion. Soon thereafter, European imperialism would become the driving force for the abolition of slavery around the world. Continue reading to learn more. The Barbary Slave Trade is a relatively small part of the Arab Slave Trade, which itself is only one part of the Islamic Slave Trade (which besides Arab slavers, includes Turks enslaving Europeans and Africans, Muslim invaders of India and Sub-Saharan Africa, Malay enslavers of local minorities, and other Islamic slavers). For example, the Arab Slave Trade may have enslaved up to 18 million people over its span (not including those born enslaved), while the Barbary Slave Trade enslaved some number over 1 million. Bear in mind that this number is three times the number of enslaved people (roughly 388 thousand) sent to the area of the United Sta

The Sixth Great Mass Extinction and Human Survival

Recently, there have been numerous articles about a study showing that we are in the midst of the Earth's sixth great mass extinction.  Below are some quotes, and then I will give my thoughts. "Miami (AFP) - The world is embarking on its sixth mass extinction with animals disappearing about 100 times faster than they used to, scientists warned Friday, and humans could be among the first victims." "Not since the age of the dinosaurs ended 66 million years ago has the planet been losing species at this rapid a rate, said a study led by experts at Stanford University, Princeton University and the University of California, Berkeley." "The study "shows without any significant doubt that we are now entering the sixth great mass extinction event," said co-author Paul Ehrlich, a Stanford University professor of biology." http://news.yahoo.com/sixth-mass-extinction-us-study-210749359.html This is sad, although it's not news.  I