Forget Orwell's 1984. This reads like it's out of the Inquisition of Galileo, which, I might remind you, took place in the early 1600s. It is likely that today's Europe is was more tolerant of free speech by the year 1700 than it is now. Below are some quotes from the article, along with some notes from me.
https://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/european-court-indicates-blasphemy-wont-be-tolerated-as-free-speech-1155530
"The case concerned an Austrian who held two seminars on Islam. She discussed an alleged marriage between the Prophet Muhammad and a 6-year-old girl, and commented, 'What do we call it, if it is not paedophilia?'"
That's a good question. But that's the question that Europe will not tolerate.
"The woman was subsequently convicted for disparaging religious doctrines and ordered to pay a fine. The case then proceeded to appeal. The European Court of Human Rights affirms the conviction."
"While nodding to the importance of context — the situation in a particular country — and affording some discretion for local authorities to evaluate whether statements are likely to disturb the religious peace, the European Court sees impermissible blasphemy here."
"Specifically, it's upheld that the woman's statements 'had been capable of arousing justified indignation; specifically, they had not been made in an objective manner contributing to a debate of public interest (e.g. on child marriage), but could only be understood as having been aimed at demonstrating that Muhammad was not worthy of worship.'"
Europe now convicts those who believe and state that "Muhammad was not worthy of worship". Is there anything scarier than that?
"What's more, the European Court agrees that the woman 'must have been aware that her statements were partly based on untrue facts and apt to arouse indignation in others' and that she 'subjectively labelled Muhammad with paedophilia as his general sexual preference, and that she failed to neutrally inform her audience of the historical background, which consequently did not allow for a serious debate on that issue.'"
There are ZERO "untrue" facts. Even if some things were untrue, if telling a lie were a crime, billions of people would be in prison at this moment. But it was 100% true. The Hadith says:
"Narrated 'Aisha: that the Prophet married her when she was six years old and he consummated his marriage when she was nine years old, and then she remained with him for nine years (i.e., till his death)."
- Sahih Bukhari 7:62:64
What's more, Muhammad is the ONLY person in history who people don't call a refer to as a pedophile because he ALSO had sex with adults. If a 53-year-old man had sex with your 9-year-old daughter...BUT...that 53-year-old man had also had sex with adults...would you label him a "pedophile", or would you say, "He's obviously not a pedophile, because although he had sex with my daughter, he also had sex with adult women."
I have been thinking recently that in Europe, THERE IS LESS AND LESS TO ACTUALLY STRIVE TO SAVE. When you wish that thinkers from the 1700s would sort our modern society out, it really shows how far our modern society has fallen.
E pur si muove. | And yet it moves
(Via +Ravi Shastry from Google+)
#Muhammad #MuhammadWasAPedophile #TheEUProtectsPedophilia #Injustice #Inquisition
https://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/european-court-indicates-blasphemy-wont-be-tolerated-as-free-speech-1155530
"The case concerned an Austrian who held two seminars on Islam. She discussed an alleged marriage between the Prophet Muhammad and a 6-year-old girl, and commented, 'What do we call it, if it is not paedophilia?'"
That's a good question. But that's the question that Europe will not tolerate.
"The woman was subsequently convicted for disparaging religious doctrines and ordered to pay a fine. The case then proceeded to appeal. The European Court of Human Rights affirms the conviction."
"While nodding to the importance of context — the situation in a particular country — and affording some discretion for local authorities to evaluate whether statements are likely to disturb the religious peace, the European Court sees impermissible blasphemy here."
"Specifically, it's upheld that the woman's statements 'had been capable of arousing justified indignation; specifically, they had not been made in an objective manner contributing to a debate of public interest (e.g. on child marriage), but could only be understood as having been aimed at demonstrating that Muhammad was not worthy of worship.'"
Europe now convicts those who believe and state that "Muhammad was not worthy of worship". Is there anything scarier than that?
"What's more, the European Court agrees that the woman 'must have been aware that her statements were partly based on untrue facts and apt to arouse indignation in others' and that she 'subjectively labelled Muhammad with paedophilia as his general sexual preference, and that she failed to neutrally inform her audience of the historical background, which consequently did not allow for a serious debate on that issue.'"
There are ZERO "untrue" facts. Even if some things were untrue, if telling a lie were a crime, billions of people would be in prison at this moment. But it was 100% true. The Hadith says:
"Narrated 'Aisha: that the Prophet married her when she was six years old and he consummated his marriage when she was nine years old, and then she remained with him for nine years (i.e., till his death)."
- Sahih Bukhari 7:62:64
What's more, Muhammad is the ONLY person in history who people don't call a refer to as a pedophile because he ALSO had sex with adults. If a 53-year-old man had sex with your 9-year-old daughter...BUT...that 53-year-old man had also had sex with adults...would you label him a "pedophile", or would you say, "He's obviously not a pedophile, because although he had sex with my daughter, he also had sex with adult women."
I have been thinking recently that in Europe, THERE IS LESS AND LESS TO ACTUALLY STRIVE TO SAVE. When you wish that thinkers from the 1700s would sort our modern society out, it really shows how far our modern society has fallen.
E pur si muove. | And yet it moves
(Via +Ravi Shastry from Google+)
#Muhammad #MuhammadWasAPedophile #TheEUProtectsPedophilia #Injustice #Inquisition
Comments
Post a Comment